Skip to main content

Blog

How to be more productive in Linear (without writing more tickets)

Linear productivity is mostly about clarity: fewer meetings, fewer follow-ups, and issues that are easy to execute. Here’s a practical workflow (with templates) that makes teams faster.

· 3 min read
How to be more productive in Linear (without writing more tickets)

“Be more productive in Linear” rarely means “type faster.”

It usually means:

  • fewer clarification loops,
  • fewer meetings,
  • fewer half-finished tickets,
  • and more issues that can be executed end-to-end.

This guide is a workflow you can apply today — even if your team’s process is messy.

TL;DR

  • Productivity in Linear is clarity, not velocity theater.
  • The biggest leverage comes from writing issues that reduce follow-up: context → scope → acceptance criteria.
  • Linear’s own method pushes toward issues over user stories and continuous planning; those ideas map well to real teams when you keep things lightweight.
  • If writing is the bottleneck, don’t “work more hours.” Reduce friction: draft the prose quickly, then edit for precision.

1) Make every issue answer 3 questions (context, scope, done)

If someone reads your issue and still asks “what is this?” or “when is it done?” you didn’t write an issue — you wrote an invitation to a meeting.

Use this structure:

Context (why)

One short paragraph:

  • what problem are we solving?
  • who is impacted?
  • what’s the evidence (links, screenshots, metrics)?

Scope (what)

Bullets:

  • in scope
  • out of scope

Done (how we know)

A checklist of acceptance criteria.

Linear’s own guidance leans toward writing issues that are actionable rather than story-shaped artifacts: “Write issues not user stories” (Linear Method).

2) Use acceptance criteria to reduce back-and-forth

Acceptance criteria aren’t “extra paperwork” if they prevent two days of ambiguity.

Keep them lightweight:

  • user-visible behavior
  • edge cases (2–3 bullets)
  • performance constraints (if relevant)

Atlassian’s explainer is a good baseline reference for what acceptance criteria are and why they matter (even if you don’t use Jira): Atlassian: Acceptance criteria.

3) Write “asynchronously executable” tickets

Here’s a quick test:

Could a teammate pick this up tomorrow in a different timezone and ship it without calling you?

If not, add:

  • links to designs/logs
  • expected vs actual (for bugs)
  • a short “non-goals” list

4) Use Linear like an editor, not a form

Linear’s editor supports a writing-first flow. Two useful references:

If you want to move faster inside the app, it’s also worth learning (or at least skimming) shortcut help:

The point isn’t to memorize every shortcut — it’s to reduce the number of tiny UI interactions you do 200 times per week.

5) Stop “typing into the void” — use a template you can reuse

Copy/paste this template into your issues:

Template: Feature / improvement

  • Context: …
  • Goal: …
  • Non-goals: …
  • Approach (optional): …
  • Acceptance criteria:
    • [ ] …
    • [ ] …
    • [ ] …
  • Links: designs, docs, PRs

Template: Bug

  • Summary: …
  • Steps to reproduce:
    1. …
    2. …
  • Expected vs actual: …
  • Impact / severity: …
  • Acceptance criteria:
    • [ ] regression test added
    • [ ] fix verified on …
  • Links: logs, screenshots

6) If writing is your bottleneck, draft fast then edit

Many teams move slower in Linear because writing the issue takes too long — so people don’t do it well.

A practical workaround:

  1. Draft quickly (don’t self-edit mid-sentence)
  2. Then edit the 10% that matters (names, IDs, links, formatting)

One way to reduce friction on macOS is speech-to-text for the first draft (especially for context and acceptance criteria), then keyboard for precise edits.

If you want the exact setup in Linear: /how-to/linear-mac-dictation

7) “Vibe coding” makes tickets more important, not less

If your team is using AI-first editors or “vibe coding” workflows, the bottleneck shifts:

  • less time typing code from scratch
  • more time specifying what should happen
  • more need for a review checklist

That makes clear issues and acceptance criteria even more valuable.

Guide: /blog/vibe-coding

Keep going

Sources

Related articles

Ergonomics
Ergonomic split keyboard: benefits, downsides, and what the evidence says

An ergonomic split keyboard can improve wrist and shoulder posture — but it won’t fix typing volume. Here’s what split keyboard ergonomics really change, what studies suggest, and when voice typing helps more.

Ergonomics
Typing pain in fingers: what helps (and when to use voice typing)

If you get typing pain in fingers, the fix is rarely “one perfect keyboard.” Try load management: reduce keystrokes, adjust setup, and use speech-to-text for drafts. Here’s a practical approach with research + community references.